Pima vs Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Pima
Ethiopian
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Pima
Ethiopians
79.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
86.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,528,436 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022 and weighted average of 79.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,145,375 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225 and weighted average of 86.6%, a difference of 9.5%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 46.4% | 69.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.6% | 30.7% |
| Mean | 79.8% | 87.9% |
| Median | 81.6% | 87.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 71.6% | 85.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.0% | 90.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Ethiopia (86.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Luxembourger (86.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Liberian (86.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Ireland (86.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and Somali (86.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 86.6% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 86.6% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 86.6% |
| Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 86.4% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 86.3% |
| Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 86.2% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 86.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 86.2% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 86.2% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 86.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 86.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 86.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 86.1% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 86.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 86.1% |