Marshallese vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Marshallese
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Comparison
Marshallese
Chinese
77.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,760,991 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 77.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,808,850 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400 and weighted average of 77.3%, a difference of 0.23%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 28.6% | 57.5% |
| Maximum | 98.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 69.9% | 42.5% |
| Mean | 77.5% | 79.9% |
| Median | 79.1% | 79.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 69.9% | 75.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 91.3% | 83.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.1% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.5% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Marshallese and Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Irish (77.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Czechoslovakian (77.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Scottish (77.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Welsh (77.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Congo (77.4%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Serbian (77.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Malaysian (77.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Croatian (77.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Ethiopian (77.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Indonesian (77.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 77.5% |
| German Russians | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 77.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 77.5% |
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 77.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 77.5% |
| Marshallese | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Irish | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| French | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 77.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 77.3% |
| Serbians | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 77.3% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 77.3% |
| Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 77.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 77.2% |