Marshallese vs Chinese Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Marshallese
Chinese
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Marshallese
Chinese
17.7%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Chinese Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,761,315 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 11.3%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Marshallese | Chinese |
Minimum | 9.9% | 10.5% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 30.0% |
Range | 13.1% | 19.5% |
Mean | 17.2% | 16.3% |
Median | 17.3% | 16.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 13.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.3% | 17.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (17.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Central America (17.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Guatemala (17.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Vietnamese (17.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Mongolian (17.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 6.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.6% |
Zimbabweans | 6.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.6% |
Moroccans | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.6% |
Central Americans | 4.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.7% |
Alsatians | 4.5 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.7% |
Fijians | 3.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.7% |
Vietnamese | 3.4 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.7% |
Marshallese | 2.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 2.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 2.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 17.7% |
Mongolians | 2.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 17.7% |
Guatemalans | 2.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 17.8% |
Tongans | 2.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 17.8% |
Panamanians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 17.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from India (15.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lithuania (16.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.0%, a difference of 0.59%), Thai (16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Ireland (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 15.7% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 15.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 16.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 16.2% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Austria | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 16.3% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 16.3% |