Marshallese vs Chinese Disability Age 18 to 34
COMPARE
Marshallese
Chinese
Disability Age 18 to 34
Disability Age 18 to 34 Comparison
Marshallese
Chinese
7.1%
DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.3%
DISABILITY AGE 18 TO 34
91.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Marshallese vs Chinese Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,758,434 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 7.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,771,320 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 18 and 35 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 12.3%.
Disability Age 18 to 34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Marshallese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 13.5% | 18.0% |
| Range | 12.7% | 16.1% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 6.8% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 18 to 34
Demographics Similar to Marshallese by Disability Age 18 to 34
In terms of disability age 18 to 34, the demographic groups most similar to Marshallese are Austrian (7.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Italian (7.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Liberian (7.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Nepalese (7.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 18 to 34 |
| Ute | 3.8 /100 | #231 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Samoans | 3.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 7.0% |
| New Zealanders | 2.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Alsatians | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Austrians | 1.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Marshallese | 1.3 /100 | #238 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Italians | 1.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 1.1 /100 | #240 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Icelanders | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Hungarians | 0.9 /100 | #245 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Disability Age 18 to 34
In terms of disability age 18 to 34, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are West Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (6.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Macedonian (6.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Morocco (6.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Costa Rican (6.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 18 to 34 |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.9 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Macedonians | 92.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 92.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| West Indians | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Chinese | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 90.5 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.4 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Guatemalans | 89.6 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 88.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.4% |
| Palestinians | 88.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.4% |