Creek vs Yuman In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Creek
Yuman
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Creek
Yuman
80.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
77.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Yuman In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,425,767 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.326 and weighted average of 80.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,678,210 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276 and weighted average of 77.1%, a difference of 4.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Yuman |
Minimum | 25.0% | 48.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 75.0% | 51.4% |
Mean | 76.2% | 73.6% |
Median | 78.2% | 72.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.7% | 60.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.1% | 84.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 24.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 15.3% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Yuman by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Sioux (80.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Colville (80.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Houma (79.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Seminole (80.8%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 0.84%), Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 0.87%), Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Crow (75.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |