Creek vs Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Creek
Iroquois
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Creek
Iroquois
80.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
81.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
313th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,425,767 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.326 and weighted average of 80.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,240,076 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.512 and weighted average of 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Iroquois |
Minimum | 25.0% | 18.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 75.0% | 81.7% |
Mean | 76.2% | 78.4% |
Median | 78.2% | 82.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 70.7% | 70.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.1% | 91.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.4% | 20.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Iroquois by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Sioux (80.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Colville (80.7%, a difference of 0.41%), Houma (79.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Seminole (80.8%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican (81.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Alaskan Athabascan (81.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Cherokee (81.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from the Azores (81.5%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 81.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 81.9% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.6% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.4% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.4% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.3% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.2% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |