Creek vs Yuman Male Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Yuman
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Creek
Yuman
15.5%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Yuman Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,460,797 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.301 and weighted average of 15.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,251 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 5.4%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Yuman |
Minimum | 4.5% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 52.5% | 45.6% |
Range | 48.1% | 42.1% |
Mean | 21.9% | 19.8% |
Median | 20.7% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 10.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.6% | 26.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Yuman by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Puerto Rican (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Tsimshian (15.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Kiowa (15.4%, a difference of 0.66%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Seminole (14.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Dutch West Indian (14.8%, a difference of 0.70%), Tohono O'odham (14.6%, a difference of 0.87%), and Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.4% |