Slavic vs Inupiat Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Slavic
Inupiat
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Slavs
Inupiat
47.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
96.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Inupiat Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,816,374 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 47.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,320,700 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 42.4%, a difference of 12.8%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Inupiat |
| Minimum | 18.2% | 12.1% |
| Maximum | 82.5% | 81.8% |
| Range | 64.3% | 69.7% |
| Mean | 53.3% | 42.6% |
| Median | 52.1% | 43.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.5% | 34.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.2% | 51.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.7% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 14.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 14.3% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Hawaiian (47.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (47.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (47.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (47.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Austria (47.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 96.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Latvians | 96.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 96.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 96.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Turks | 96.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Slavs | 96.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Hawaiians | 96.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 96.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.5 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Portuguese | 95.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Estonians | 94.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 47.7% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 94.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 47.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |