Slavic vs Pima Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Slavic
Pima
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Slavs
Pima
47.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
96.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
35.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Pima Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,816,374 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 47.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,795 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.854 and weighted average of 35.6%, a difference of 34.5%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Pima |
Minimum | 18.2% | 6.1% |
Maximum | 82.5% | 74.1% |
Range | 64.3% | 68.0% |
Mean | 53.3% | 36.2% |
Median | 52.1% | 40.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.5% | 19.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.2% | 48.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.7% | 28.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 18.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 18.1% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Hawaiian (47.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (47.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (47.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (47.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Austria (47.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 96.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Latvians | 96.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Austria | 96.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Italy | 96.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Turks | 96.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Slavs | 96.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Hawaiians | 96.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 96.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.5 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Portuguese | 95.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Estonians | 94.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Immigrants | Japan | 94.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (36.2%, a difference of 1.9%), Hopi (36.7%, a difference of 3.2%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (37.3%, a difference of 5.0%), Immigrants from Grenada (37.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and Tohono O'odham (37.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 38.7% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 38.6% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 38.5% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 38.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 38.4% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 38.3% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 38.2% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 38.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 37.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 37.3% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 36.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 35.6% |