Arapaho vs Inupiat Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Arapaho
Inupiat
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Arapaho
Inupiat
41.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Inupiat Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,778,233 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 41.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,320,700 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.395 and weighted average of 42.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Arapaho | Inupiat |
Minimum | 5.6% | 12.1% |
Maximum | 71.4% | 81.8% |
Range | 65.7% | 69.7% |
Mean | 40.7% | 42.6% |
Median | 40.1% | 43.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 33.7% | 34.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.0% | 51.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.2% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 14.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Inupiat by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Immigrants from Middle Africa (41.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (41.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sudan (41.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Yemen (42.0%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.1% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |