Laotian vs Pima Family Households
COMPARE
Laotian
Pima
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Laotians
Pima
65.8%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Pima Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,743,344 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129 and weighted average of 65.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.25%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Pima |
| Minimum | 54.7% | 40.4% |
| Maximum | 96.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 42.1% | 59.6% |
| Mean | 71.8% | 69.9% |
| Median | 69.9% | 68.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.4% | 63.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 78.3% | 76.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.1% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Pima by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Burmese (65.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |