Arapaho vs Pima Family Households
COMPARE
Arapaho
Pima
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Arapaho
Pima
66.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arapaho vs Pima Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,778,233 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388 and weighted average of 66.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.82%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arapaho | Pima |
| Minimum | 41.9% | 40.4% |
| Maximum | 95.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 53.8% | 59.6% |
| Mean | 69.3% | 69.9% |
| Median | 67.2% | 68.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 63.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 78.6% | 76.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.8% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Arapaho and Pima by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Arapaho are Venezuelan (66.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Bolivian (66.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (66.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Navajo (66.4%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Central American (66.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Danish (66.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |