Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Pima
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Pima
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Pima Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,251,073 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,539,566 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.50%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Pima |
Minimum | 41.4% | 40.4% |
Maximum | 94.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.9% | 59.6% |
Mean | 68.0% | 69.9% |
Median | 67.1% | 68.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.6% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.1% | 76.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Pima by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Jordanian (65.5%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Costa Rican (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Filipino (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (66.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |