Iroquois vs Yuman Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Iroquois
Yuman
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Iroquois
Yuman
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Yuman Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,663,496 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Yuman and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.526 and weighted average of 43.3%, a difference of 1.0%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Yuman |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 60.2% |
| Range | 90.4% | 56.2% |
| Mean | 45.4% | 41.8% |
| Median | 46.1% | 42.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.2% | 30.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.1% | 53.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 23.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.2% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Yuman by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yuman are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Guatemalan (43.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ethiopian (43.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
| Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |