Immigrants from South Africa vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,270,946 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 47.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 4.2%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Africa	Chickasaw
Minimum	20.5%	20.0%
Maximum	100.0%	65.4%
Range	79.5%	45.4%
Mean	57.1%	47.8%
Median	52.7%	48.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	45.5%	43.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	66.0%	53.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	20.6%	10.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	20.2%	8.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	19.9%	8.6%

Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Slavic (47.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Hawaiian (47.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (47.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Italy (47.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Austria (47.9%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Latvians	96.5 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 47.9%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	96.4 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 47.9%
Immigrants \| Austria	96.4 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 47.9%
Immigrants \| Italy	96.3 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 47.9%
Turks	96.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 47.8%
Slavs	96.0 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 47.8%
Hawaiians	96.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 47.8%
Immigrants \| South Africa	96.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 47.8%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	95.5 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 47.8%
Portuguese	95.5 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 47.8%
Estonians	94.7 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 47.7%
Immigrants \| Japan	94.4 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 47.7%
Immigrants \| Jordan	94.1 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 47.7%
Macedonians	93.9 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 47.6%
Syrians	93.9 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 47.6%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
South American Indians	28.4 /100 \| #188	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Latvia	26.9 /100 \| #189	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	25.6 /100 \| #190	Fair 46.0%
Choctaw	24.9 /100 \| #191	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	24.6 /100 \| #192	Fair 46.0%
Taiwanese	23.4 /100 \| #193	Fair 45.9%
Mexican American Indians	23.3 /100 \| #194	Fair 45.9%
Chickasaw	22.7 /100 \| #195	Fair 45.9%
Immigrants \| South America	22.2 /100 \| #196	Fair 45.9%
Cambodians	21.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 45.9%
Ottawa	19.4 /100 \| #198	Poor 45.8%
Carpatho Rusyns	15.7 /100 \| #199	Poor 45.7%
Potawatomi	15.6 /100 \| #200	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants \| Serbia	15.2 /100 \| #201	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants \| Central America	14.2 /100 \| #202	Poor 45.7%