Immigrants from Jordan vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
Chickasaw
47.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,252,999 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.220 and weighted average of 47.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 3.8%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 24.7% | 20.0% |
Maximum | 69.8% | 65.4% |
Range | 45.1% | 45.4% |
Mean | 50.1% | 47.8% |
Median | 49.9% | 48.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.0% | 43.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.6% | 53.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Macedonian (47.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (47.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Peruvian (47.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Japan (47.7%, a difference of 0.050%), and Venezuelan (47.6%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Slavs | 96.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Hawaiians | 96.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 96.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.5 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Portuguese | 95.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Estonians | 94.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Immigrants | Japan | 94.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Macedonians | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 47.6% |
Syrians | 93.9 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 47.6% |
Peruvians | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 47.6% |
Venezuelans | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 47.6% |
Immigrants | Europe | 93.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 47.6% |
Slovaks | 92.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 47.6% |
Argentineans | 92.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 47.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |