Creek vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Creek
Chilean
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Creek
Chileans
37.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Chilean Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,524,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727 and weighted average of 37.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,289,700 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 30.7%, a difference of 22.5%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Chilean |
| Minimum | 7.7% | 10.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.3% | 89.1% |
| Mean | 50.2% | 40.9% |
| Median | 45.8% | 32.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.5% | 27.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.2% | 44.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.7% | 17.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.3% | 23.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.0% | 23.4% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Creek by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Mexico (37.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Central America (37.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Alaskan Athabascan (37.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 37.3% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 37.3% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 37.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 38.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Serbian (30.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Somali (30.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Italian (30.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Oceania (30.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Northern European (30.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #141 | Excellent 30.5% |
| South Africans | 82.7 /100 | #142 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 82.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Czechs | 82.1 /100 | #144 | Excellent 30.5% |
| Immigrants | North America | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Northern Europeans | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 81.2 /100 | #147 | Excellent 30.6% |
| Chileans | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 30.7% |
| Serbians | 78.8 /100 | #149 | Good 30.7% |
| Somalis | 77.8 /100 | #150 | Good 30.7% |
| Italians | 77.0 /100 | #151 | Good 30.8% |
| Poles | 76.2 /100 | #152 | Good 30.8% |
| British | 76.0 /100 | #153 | Good 30.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 30.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 73.9 /100 | #155 | Good 30.9% |