Creek vs Immigrants from Micronesia Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Creek
Immigrants from Micronesia
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Creek
Immigrants from Micronesia
37.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
16.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
202nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Immigrants from Micronesia Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,524,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727 and weighted average of 37.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,950,246 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 32.9%, a difference of 14.3%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Immigrants from Micronesia |
Minimum | 7.7% | 8.4% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.3% | 91.6% |
Mean | 50.2% | 40.8% |
Median | 45.8% | 34.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.5% | 26.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.2% | 40.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.7% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.3% | 23.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.0% | 23.5% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Creek by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Mexico (37.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Central America (37.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Alaskan Athabascan (37.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 37.3% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 37.3% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 37.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 38.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (32.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Germany (32.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Thailand (32.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Ute (33.0%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Africa (33.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |