Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Celtic
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Celtics
37.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,775,598 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 37.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,463,744 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 13.3%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Celtic |
Minimum | 12.2% | 14.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 87.8% | 86.0% |
Mean | 64.8% | 47.2% |
Median | 63.4% | 39.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 36.2% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 55.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.8% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.5% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.1% | 24.5% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Hispanic or Latino (37.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Creek (37.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Seminole (37.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and Blackfeet (37.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 37.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 38.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 38.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 38.3% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (33.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Slovak (33.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
Alsatians | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 33.8% |