Norwegian vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Norwegian
Celtic
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Norwegians
Celtics
29.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
95.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 477,355,885 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633 and weighted average of 29.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,463,744 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 13.5%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Celtic |
Minimum | 7.7% | 14.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.3% | 86.0% |
Mean | 41.3% | 47.2% |
Median | 32.9% | 39.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.3% | 31.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.7% | 55.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.4% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.3% | 24.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.2% | 24.5% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from South Africa (29.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Syria (29.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Vietnam (29.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Denmark (29.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Luxembourger (29.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 29.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 96.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 29.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 96.6 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 29.2% |
Arabs | 96.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 29.2% |
Estonians | 96.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 29.2% |
Ukrainians | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 29.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 96.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 29.3% |
Norwegians | 95.8 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 29.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.7 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 29.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 95.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 29.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 29.4% |
Luxembourgers | 95.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 29.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 94.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 29.5% |
Australians | 94.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 29.5% |
Lebanese | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 29.5% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (33.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Slovak (33.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
Alsatians | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 33.8% |