Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Creek
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Creek
37.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
37.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Creek Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,775,598 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 37.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,524,470 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.727 and weighted average of 37.6%, a difference of 0.40%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Creek |
Minimum | 12.2% | 7.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 87.8% | 92.3% |
Mean | 64.8% | 50.2% |
Median | 63.4% | 45.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 36.2% | 34.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 60.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 63.8% | 25.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.5% | 25.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.1% | 25.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Creek by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Hispanic or Latino (37.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Seminole (37.9%, a difference of 0.48%), Blackfeet (37.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Guatemala (37.5%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Mexico (37.5%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Central America (37.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Spanish American Indian (37.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 37.1% |
West Indians | 0.1 /100 | #279 | Tragic 37.3% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.1 /100 | #280 | Tragic 37.3% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #281 | Tragic 37.3% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 37.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 38.0% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 38.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 38.3% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 38.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 38.5% |