Zimbabwean vs Czechoslovakian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Czechoslovakian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Czechoslovakians
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
3.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Czechoslovakian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,636,980 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 18.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 0.94% |
| Maximum | 17.3% | 50.5% |
| Range | 16.5% | 49.6% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 10.8% |
| Median | 5.2% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 9.0% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican (6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Panamanian (6.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Slavic (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |