Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Iroquois
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Iroquois
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
306th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,187,176 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,272,935 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.675 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 30.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 17.3% | 40.9% |
| Range | 16.5% | 37.9% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 12.5% |
| Median | 5.2% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Tongan (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Spanish American (7.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Chippewa (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from the Azores (7.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Micronesia (7.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and Arapaho (7.1%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |