Immigrants from Iraq vs Czechoslovakian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Iraq
Czechoslovakian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Iraq
Czechoslovakians
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
14.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
3.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Iraq vs Czechoslovakian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,765,362 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,636,980 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 1.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Iraq | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 0.94% |
| Maximum | 11.5% | 50.5% |
| Range | 7.8% | 49.6% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 10.8% |
| Median | 6.4% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 9.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Iraq and Czechoslovakians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iraq are Immigrants from Laos (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Samoan (6.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Slavic (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Honduran (6.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and Liberian (6.3%, a difference of 0.83%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% |
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |