Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Oceania
15.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
61.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,688,443 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,480,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 25.3%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 4.7% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 45.6% | 48.6% |
| Range | 41.0% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 21.5% | 15.8% |
| Median | 19.7% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Colville (15.1%, a difference of 0.95%), Dutch West Indian (15.0%, a difference of 1.4%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.4%), Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Czech (12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Guatemalan (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Lithuanian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Guyanese (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 72.4 /100 | #158 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 67.7 /100 | #159 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 66.0 /100 | #160 | Good 12.1% |
| Guyanese | 64.7 /100 | #161 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 64.3 /100 | #162 | Good 12.1% |
| Guatemalans | 63.8 /100 | #163 | Good 12.1% |
| Czechs | 63.6 /100 | #164 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 61.8 /100 | #165 | Good 12.1% |
| Lithuanians | 59.5 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 59.0 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 58.8 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |
| Lebanese | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 12.2% |
| Maltese | 57.0 /100 | #170 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 56.3 /100 | #171 | Average 12.2% |
| Haitians | 51.9 /100 | #172 | Average 12.2% |