Uruguayan vs Choctaw Female Disability
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Choctaw
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Uruguayans
Choctaw
11.7%
FEMALE DISABILITY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Choctaw Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,784,627 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,656,358 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 32.0%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Choctaw |
Minimum | 7.1% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 27.2% | 50.6% |
Range | 20.2% | 48.2% |
Mean | 15.3% | 23.8% |
Median | 12.9% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 26.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Korean (11.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Russia (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Philippines (11.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Uruguay (11.7%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.5 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.0 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Koreans | 99.0 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Uruguayans | 98.8 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 98.5 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 98.4 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 98.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Australians | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (15.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 2.3%), Colville (15.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |