Romanian vs Choctaw Female Disability
COMPARE
Romanian
Choctaw
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Romanians
Choctaw
11.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Choctaw Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,864,949 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,656,358 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 29.3%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Choctaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 50.6% |
Range | 27.9% | 48.2% |
Mean | 13.9% | 23.8% |
Median | 12.5% | 21.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 26.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Female Disability
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Ecuador (11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Africa (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Ecuadorian (11.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Kenyans | 94.5 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 94.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Central Americans | 94.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Ugandans | 94.0 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 93.8 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Ecuadorians | 93.4 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 92.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Romanians | 91.6 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 90.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 89.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.9% |
Immigrants | Austria | 87.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 12.0% |
Estonians | 87.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 12.0% |
Pakistanis | 84.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 12.0% |
Nigerians | 84.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 12.0% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (15.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 2.3%), Colville (15.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |