Cherokee vs Choctaw Female Disability
COMPARE
Cherokee
Choctaw
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Cherokee
Choctaw
14.9%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Choctaw Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,548,902 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,656,358 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 3.7%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cherokee | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 50.6% |
| Range | 54.6% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 20.9% | 23.8% |
| Median | 20.2% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 18.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.3% | 26.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Choctaw by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Cajun (14.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from the Azores (14.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Pima (14.8%, a difference of 0.48%), Seminole (15.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and Tohono O'odham (15.0%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (15.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Lumbee (15.8%, a difference of 2.3%), Colville (15.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and Kiowa (15.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 16.9% |