Sudanese vs Immigrants from Kenya Vision Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
Immigrants from Kenya
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Immigrants from Kenya
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Immigrants from Kenya Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,115,679 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,977,635 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.070%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Immigrants from Kenya |
Minimum | 0.17% | 0.61% |
Maximum | 5.1% | 5.3% |
Range | 4.9% | 4.7% |
Mean | 2.1% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.64% | 0.79% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.82% | 0.99% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.81% | 0.98% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Immigrants from Kenya by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |