Sudanese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vision Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,115,679 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,800,208 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.34%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.59% |
| Maximum | 5.1% | 6.8% |
| Range | 4.9% | 6.2% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.0% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.64% | 0.89% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.82% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.81% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Uganda (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Albania (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |