Ukrainian vs Immigrants from Kenya Vision Disability
COMPARE
Ukrainian
Immigrants from Kenya
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Ukrainians
Immigrants from Kenya
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
81.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ukrainian vs Immigrants from Kenya Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,040,924 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ukrainians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,977,635 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.90%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ukrainian | Immigrants from Kenya |
Minimum | 0.95% | 0.61% |
Maximum | 11.5% | 5.3% |
Range | 10.5% | 4.7% |
Mean | 3.2% | 2.4% |
Median | 2.1% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 2.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.79% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 0.99% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 0.98% |
Demographics Similar to Ukrainians and Immigrants from Kenya by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ukrainians are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), South American (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Italian (2.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and Sierra Leonean (2.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Sudanese (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and New Zealander (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 84.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 84.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.1% |
South Americans | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.1% |
Ukrainians | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 81.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 2.1% |
Italians | 79.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 78.4 /100 | #147 | Good 2.1% |