South American vs Jordanian Female Disability
COMPARE
South American
Jordanian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
South Americans
Jordanians
11.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Jordanian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,047,696 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.423 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,415,888 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.87%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Jordanian |
Minimum | 2.5% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 23.8% | 20.5% |
Range | 21.3% | 14.0% |
Mean | 10.4% | 10.6% |
Median | 10.8% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Jordanians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Laotian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Taiwanese (11.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (11.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Bulgarian (11.3%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | France | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Sri Lankans | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.4% |