Ethiopian vs Jordanian Female Disability
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Jordanian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Ethiopians
Jordanians
11.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Jordanian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,237,211 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.365 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,415,888 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.71%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Jordanian |
Minimum | 3.5% | 6.5% |
Maximum | 17.3% | 20.5% |
Range | 13.8% | 14.0% |
Mean | 10.2% | 10.6% |
Median | 10.3% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 8.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.5% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Jordanians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Cypriot (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Japan (11.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (11.2%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |