Immigrants from Malaysia vs Jordanian Female Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Jordanian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Jordanians
11.1%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Jordanian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,971,207 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,415,888 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 20.5% |
| Range | 31.4% | 14.0% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 10.6% |
| Median | 10.9% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Jordanians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Turkish (11.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Egyptian (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Kuwait (11.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Australia (11.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Egypt (11.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Afghan (11.2%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Egyptians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |