South African vs Macedonian Male Disability
COMPARE
South African
Macedonian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
South Africans
Macedonians
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
81.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
84.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Macedonian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,590,861 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,656,892 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.262 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.25%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Macedonian |
Minimum | 2.7% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 25.0% | 21.7% |
Range | 22.3% | 20.1% |
Mean | 11.6% | 10.8% |
Median | 10.8% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 3.3% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Macedonians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sudan (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144 | Good 11.0% |
Costa Ricans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 11.0% |