South African vs Armenian Male Disability
COMPARE
South African
Armenian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
South Africans
Armenians
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
81.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
90.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Armenian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,590,861 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,935,908 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.211 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 1.0%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Armenian |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 25.0% | 39.5% |
| Range | 22.3% | 33.7% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 12.6% |
| Median | 10.8% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Armenians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and South American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |