South African vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
South African
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
South Africans
Immigrants from Bangladesh
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
24.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,561,768 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,637,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 6.0%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
Minimum | 1.5% | 0.46% |
Maximum | 27.3% | 15.9% |
Range | 25.7% | 15.4% |
Mean | 7.3% | 6.1% |
Median | 5.8% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 2.1% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |