Canadian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Canadian
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Canadians
Immigrants from Bangladesh
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
10.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
24.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,391,973 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,637,177 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Immigrants from Bangladesh |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.46% |
| Maximum | 38.9% | 15.9% |
| Range | 37.8% | 15.4% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 6.1% |
| Median | 7.7% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians and Immigrants from Bangladesh by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Mexican American Indian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Japanese (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Italian (6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Cambodia (6.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
| Japanese | 12.0 /100 | #213 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% |
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% |