South African vs Immigrants from Poland Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
South African
Immigrants from Poland
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
South Africans
Immigrants from Poland
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
114th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Immigrants from Poland Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,561,768 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.765 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,808,570 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.28%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Immigrants from Poland |
Minimum | 1.5% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 27.3% | 17.5% |
Range | 25.7% | 14.7% |
Mean | 7.3% | 6.5% |
Median | 5.8% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Immigrants from Poland by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Immigrants from Uruguay (5.9%, a difference of 0.060%), South American Indian (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Danish (5.8%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.8% |
New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% |
South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |