Moroccan vs Northern European Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Moroccan
Northern European
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Moroccans
Northern Europeans
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
52.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Northern European Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,789,132 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 405,984,398 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Northern European |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 15.0% | 21.8% |
| Range | 12.5% | 19.9% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 8.3% |
| Median | 6.2% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Northern Europeans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Croatian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |