Okinawan vs Northern European Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Okinawan
Northern European
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Okinawans
Northern Europeans
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Okinawan vs Northern European Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,734,691 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 405,984,398 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Okinawan | Northern European |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 10.6% | 21.8% |
| Range | 8.7% | 19.9% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 8.3% |
| Median | 4.8% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.7% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 4.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Okinawans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Northern Europeans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Northern Europeans are Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |