Moroccan vs Immigrants from Thailand Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Moroccan
Immigrants from Thailand
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Moroccans
Immigrants from Thailand
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
52.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
42.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Immigrants from Thailand Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,789,132 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,957,387 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.55%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Moroccan | Immigrants from Thailand |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Range | 12.5% | 13.9% |
Mean | 6.9% | 7.0% |
Median | 6.2% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 8.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Immigrants from Thailand by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Croatian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Canada (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |