Malaysian vs Immigrants from Thailand Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Malaysian
Immigrants from Thailand
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Malaysians
Immigrants from Thailand
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
28.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
42.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Thailand Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,050,790 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,957,387 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.82%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Immigrants from Thailand |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 16.3% | 15.0% |
| Range | 15.2% | 13.9% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 7.0% |
| Median | 6.4% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Immigrants from Thailand by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Belgian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Thailand are Serbian (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ghana (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
| Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |