Malaysian vs Belgian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Malaysian
Belgian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Malaysians
Belgians
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
28.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
28.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Belgian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,050,790 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,928,519 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.030%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Malaysian | Belgian |
Minimum | 1.1% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 16.3% | 16.4% |
Range | 15.2% | 15.1% |
Mean | 7.1% | 6.6% |
Median | 6.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 7.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Belgians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Polish (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |
Poles | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |