Laotian vs Jordanian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Laotian
Jordanian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Laotians
Jordanians
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Jordanian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,814,363 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,412,494 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 0.98%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Jordanian |
Minimum | 0.92% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 11.4% | 8.6% |
Range | 10.4% | 6.8% |
Mean | 6.6% | 5.0% |
Median | 6.2% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Jordanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Switzerland (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from France (5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Uganda (5.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Sri Lankan (5.7%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Taiwanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 5.7% |