Laotian vs Jordanian Male Disability
COMPARE
Laotian
Jordanian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Laotians
Jordanians
10.6%
MALE DISABILITY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Jordanian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,854,560 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,415,761 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 0.90%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Laotian | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 5.0% |
| Maximum | 30.4% | 23.2% |
| Range | 26.3% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 12.0% | 10.8% |
| Median | 10.8% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.4% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Jordanians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Sierra Leonean (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lebanon (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Zimbabwean (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and Colombian (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 98.7 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 98.6 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.4 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 98.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.6% |