Immigrants from Japan vs Jordanian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Jordanian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Jordanians
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Jordanian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,080,063 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,412,494 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 0.74%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 33.4% | 8.6% |
| Range | 31.8% | 6.8% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 5.0% |
| Median | 5.4% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Jordanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Egyptian (5.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Sweden (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Indonesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Bulgarian (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Taiwanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |