Laotian vs Immigrants from Australia Vision Disability
COMPARE
Laotian
Immigrants from Australia
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Laotians
Immigrants from Australia
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Immigrants from Australia Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,815,117 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,117,952 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Immigrants from Australia |
Minimum | 0.55% | 0.16% |
Maximum | 7.1% | 12.7% |
Range | 6.5% | 12.6% |
Mean | 2.1% | 3.1% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 3.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.88% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Immigrants from Australia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.63%), Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and Immigrants from Ireland (2.0%, a difference of 0.89%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |