Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Vision Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Australia
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Australia
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,117,952 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 63.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Australia |
Minimum | 0.33% | 0.16% |
Maximum | 15.2% | 12.7% |
Range | 14.8% | 12.6% |
Mean | 5.4% | 3.1% |
Median | 4.6% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 1.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 3.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Turkey (1.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Egypt (1.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Luxembourger (1.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |