Laotian vs Immigrants from France Vision Disability
COMPARE
Laotian
Immigrants from France
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Laotians
Immigrants from France
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian vs Immigrants from France Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,815,117 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.044 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,766,999 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from France and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian | Immigrants from France |
Minimum | 0.55% | 0.28% |
Maximum | 7.1% | 3.5% |
Range | 6.5% | 3.2% |
Mean | 2.1% | 1.9% |
Median | 1.9% | 1.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 2.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.88% | 0.96% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 0.85% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 0.83% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians and Immigrants from France by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Somali (2.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (2.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from France are Immigrants from Northern Europe (2.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (2.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (2.0%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Maltese | 98.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.8 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Russians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | France | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 2.0% |